No it's not reliable because it didn't site sources, no last update, it's targeted towards one set of information.
yes it's reliable just for class, taken from New York (mcas) type tests. Regents Prep.
not personal page
domain: .org
created by thomas casewell
1999-2003
only 731 sites linked to it.
SUMMARY !!!.
Basically the article is abotu how students now don't understand the signifigance of the wars back in the day. They weren't easily won, there wasn't all these machine guns and bombs, they had spears and less powerful guns. The more powerful weapons aren't fair to countires without them, they stand no chance against the more powerful country.
C: i think it's unbelievable how far the technology has gotten, but we're forgetting what we're fighting for. we're not fighting just to win or prove we're stronger, our soldiers fight to keep us safe.
C: countries with advanced weaponry will easily demolish the countries without it.
british thought because we have machine guns they were better then everyone else.
thought god wanted them to dominate so they got better weapons.
created in 1997
last updated on 4/3/07 - it's fairly recent, only a few years old.
it's an educational website ( .edu )
main site is a college website. ( fordham.edu )
yes i think that this would be reliable. all of it's information seems correct, it has a educational domain, it shows when it was created and last updated, also lots of sites are linking in from the data shown on alexa.com, the daily reach isn't that low it's in the middle of the graph.
Bias: European nations become ceompetitive with eachother = nationalism, it shouldnt be just europe, it should show how everyone was affected. eruropeans took over other countrires.
yes it's reliable just for class, taken from New York (mcas) type tests. Regents Prep.
not personal page
domain: .org
created by thomas casewell
1999-2003
only 731 sites linked to it.
SUMMARY !!!.
Basically the article is abotu how students now don't understand the signifigance of the wars back in the day. They weren't easily won, there wasn't all these machine guns and bombs, they had spears and less powerful guns. The more powerful weapons aren't fair to countires without them, they stand no chance against the more powerful country.
C: i think it's unbelievable how far the technology has gotten, but we're forgetting what we're fighting for. we're not fighting just to win or prove we're stronger, our soldiers fight to keep us safe.
C: countries with advanced weaponry will easily demolish the countries without it.
british thought because we have machine guns they were better then everyone else.
thought god wanted them to dominate so they got better weapons.
HOMEWORK ON IMPERIALISM WEBSITE .
http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/modsbook34.html
created in 1997
last updated on 4/3/07 - it's fairly recent, only a few years old.
it's an educational website ( .edu )
main site is a college website. ( fordham.edu )
yes i think that this would be reliable. all of it's information seems correct, it has a educational domain, it shows when it was created and last updated, also lots of sites are linking in from the data shown on alexa.com, the daily reach isn't that low it's in the middle of the graph.
Bias: European nations become ceompetitive with eachother = nationalism, it shouldnt be just europe, it should show how everyone was affected. eruropeans took over other countrires.